One must look at the idea of oppression like a cage or a structure
Frye calls into attention that when women don't feel like they are living up to their assigned traits that they are not human, there is a notion of feeling unwanted or unreal. To feel as if you aren't a real woman is oppression in itself. She also says that when someone dresses unfeminine it shows to the world that they don't care about themselves. She isn't promoting the idea simply stating that it is the norm. So, the days that I just want to wake up and roll out of bed I am more manly? But what I like most at least at Juniata is that if you dress up or wear a dress people ask you why you look so nice or why are you wearing a dress and make a bigger deal about it. However, in reality wearing dresses is much more convenient than wearing pants and a shirt . Anyway that's besides the point.
I believe that the drive behind all of gender inequality is in the language, the definitions of things. For Frye that is no exception she says, the definition of oppression used to mold things to restrict prevent things motion mobility mold immobilize. in defining women as oppressed that makes it so there will be no chance to mobilize or break out of the mold. I sincerely hope that is not true. However, when one does break from the mold their femininity will be questioned etc. but does that still mean that they are oppressed?
No comments:
Post a Comment